Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ParcelOfRogue's avatar

"Having stronger hoovers is not going to make up for the loss of opportunity that Brexit has created..."

The EU directive to limit power and rate efficiency in consumer devices such as fridges and hoovers was intended to drive up efficiency so consumers could see what the most energy efficient products were before they bought them. It caused manufacturers to improve efficiency and save everyone's energy to reduce bills and help the environment. It pushed consumers to pick the most efficient design. In hoovers it created more suction for less cost and is a popular governmental intervention measure.

By contrast, the Brexit supporting Dyson hoovers, moved the manufacturing operation from the UK to Malaysia, just after being held up by the Leave Lot as an example of post EU British Industry. These overpriced brittle plastic pieces of junk (£350) ironically failed to pull straw out of a carpet after a local barn dance. The Publicans went into town and bought he cheapest Henry Hoover (£89) with metal body, which completed the job.

Expand full comment
S Ross's avatar

I offer "Einbildungsrückwendungswahn".

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts