Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Parcel Of Rogue's avatar

People as a majority are saying 10 years for now, because it kicks the can down the road for all that conflict and offers a fig leaf for it coming right. But the situation now is a very bad starting point for a good outcome in 3 years, 6 years or 10 years. No German car industry is coming over the horizon to rescue little ingerlund. There's no USA trade deal or oven ready great deal as the Brexits promised. If there was a USA trade deal it would privatise much of the NHS, pushing up drug costs 3-4 times and replace UK farming and food systems with hormone, anti-biotic & carbon footprint ridden, trashing rural areas, as already discussed between US & UK officials. Who wants that?

Brexit will end it's days being the dog that barks in the night.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

The problem with Nick and other peoples views that we need to rejoin and have a referendum but not for 10 years is that by then the economy will be much worse, people much poorer and public services much worse with all the additional deaths. That's the political reality of delay.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts